Aging onshore wellhead due for decommissioning

The Problem

A routine step that carries outsized risk

Removing a wellhead is one of the last jobs in plug & abandonment — and one of the few that still relies on methods built for a different era.

The traditional method

Three separate operations, three separate risks

Most onshore crews still remove a wellhead in stages, with different equipment and different people exposed at each one.

1

Hot cutting

A cutting torch is used to sever the casing — an open flame working near a wellbore that may still hold residual hydrocarbons, requiring a hot-work permit and standby fire watch.

2

Manual rigging

Once cut, the section is slung and rigged by hand so a separate crane or lifting machine can pick it clear — crew working directly beneath a suspended load.

3

Crew at the cut

Both steps put people at ground level, at or near the wellbore, for as long as the cut and lift take — often the longest and least predictable part of the job.

What it costs

Time, equipment, and exposure add up

Every extra machine on site is another mobilization cost. Every extra hour at the wellhead is another hour of crew exposure. On a multi-well pad, that adds up fast.

  • Multiple machines to mobilize

    A torch rig, a separate crane or lifting unit, and supporting vehicles — each with its own transport and setup time.

  • Permits and standby requirements

    Hot-work permits, fire watch, and the scheduling delays that come with them.

  • Extended crew exposure

    The longer the cut-and-lift sequence takes, the longer personnel remain at the wellbore.

Support equipment and vehicles mobilized at an onshore land rig in Texas

Sites we're called to

Every basin has wells like these

Aging wellheads, marginal wells, and end-of-life sites waiting on the next stage of P&A.

There's a faster way to close this out.

See How It Works